Panasonic LX100: Best P&S Ever Made

I’ve been a vocal supporter of Canon in the past, both for their dSLRs and their P&S cameras, but rest assured, these days are over. Canon is left behind in dSLRs when it comes to video, while they consciously removed existing video features from their new P&S (exposure lock and custom colors are now omitted from most new P&S), making them utterly useless. I sincerely can not recommend any new cheap Canon P&S anymore for video, while their 3 year old models performed better in terms of feature-set.

Sony has made some evolutionary steps in the right direction, but it’s Panasonic who has come to its own with their 4/3s cameras (particularly the GH4), and their P&S line. Their latest offering, of their popular LX line, is the LX100, arguably the best P&S ever. It comes with a large 4/3s sensor, a very fast f1.7 lens (with a 43mm thread to add filters!), 24p/30p/60p frame rate, 100 mbps bitrate at 4k resolution (!), full manual control, and some color control too.

Basically, it makes it the perfect video camera for indie filmmakers who don’t want to bother with lenses (e.g. if they shoot guerrilla-style all over the place), while retaining the large sensors found in dSLR-type cameras. The 4k quality you’re going to get for $900 is unparalleled too.

Now, if you don’t want to bother with 4k editing (which can be slow), then the tiny Canon EOS-M mirrorless camera is still the best bet (coming with all the video features one would expect from a Canon dSLR). It’s now selling for about $230 on eBay, as new, which makes it very cheap for what is capable of. You’d still need to buy 2-3 lenses for it though. Overall, with a wide prime, and a cheap zoom you’re probably be paying about $500. Which is still cheaper than the LX100’s $900. But you don’t get 4k or the ease of mind of using a P&S.

Personally, for the type of videos I shoot (art-type stuff), these are my best options right now.

3 Comments »

Luis wrote on September 24th, 2014 at 1:43 AM PST:

Thank you very much for your post Eugenia 🙂
I also like very much the Panasonic LX100, although, as far as i know, it does not have any port for external microphone.
The Canon EOS-M seems like a bargain.
What about the new Canon Powershot-G7X?


This is the admin speaking...
Eugenia wrote on September 24th, 2014 at 1:47 AM PST:

Unfortunately, the G7X does not offer 24p, and it also does only 1080p, with a smaller sensor (1″). So for its price tag ($700), it still makes more sense to go either with the LX100 (so you get the larger sensor, 4k, 24p), or the EOS-M (24p, mic-input, larger sensor, much cheaper).

Basically, there are many models that can be asked here (some from Panasonic, some from Sony), but none other than the EOS-M and the LX100 come close to that perfect price-to-features ratio that I personally need.


This is the admin speaking...
Eugenia wrote on September 24th, 2014 at 1:49 AM PST:

Regarding external audio from the LX100, for me at least, this is not a problem, since I don’t shoot dialog. But if I did shoot dialog with actors, I have a separate audio recorder, a boom stick, and a good microphone. To do the job properly, I’d need a whole another guy to take care of my audio, so it makes little difference if the LX100 has internal mic input or not… You see, audio captured from a separate microphone mounted on the camera many feet away from the actors never comes out professionally anyway.

In my opinion, to shoot a good quality short movie you’d need a minimum of 3 people as a crew:
– Yourself, as a camera operator, and director.
– The audio guy.
– The lights/DoP guy, who also can use the clapper.
Together, the three of you can also take care of background decor.

The actors themselves can take care of their own hair and makeup (they learn how to do this at art school usually).


Comments are closed as this blog post is now archived.

Lines, paragraphs break automatically. HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

The URI to TrackBack this blog entry is this. And here is the RSS 2.0 for comments on this post.