Troy, the movie

We watched Troy tonight on DVD, that movie with Brad Pitt, Eric Bana and that untalented chap, Orlando Bloom (he is hot only as Legolas ;). As many might already know, Greeks were pissed off about this movie last year because it did not follow Homer’s Iliad in terms of storyline: Menelaos and Agamemnon were presented as assholes instead of respectable heroes, Achilees lived to see the fall of Troy, trojan war lasted 15 days instead of 10 years etc.

Now, let me tell you this: I don’t personally find the changes in the storyline disturbing. Hollywood NEEDS a movie that WORKS with TODAY’s audience, not with the one 3,000 years ago. Therefore, the good guy and the bad guy had to live until the end of the movie, plus there had to be a bad guy to start with (Iliad is pretty neutral in its storytelling). Besides, who are we to know for sure that the Iliad way was the way things really happened? Iliad has some real story in it, but most of it is a myth in the hands of its artist (Homer). In other words, what Greeks are accusing today the movie of, is what Homer exactly did 2800 years ago when he released his number one hit to the market, Iliad: Change of the real story to suit the needs of his audience (don’t bother telling me that Achilees was indeed half-immortal cause I won’t believe you ;-).

However, where I DO have a fucking problem with the movie, is with the actual FACTS. The movie presented Sparta and Mycynae as *shipyard ports* while none of the two had any ports whatsoever (Sparta was built next to a small river, and Mycynae was in the middle of the Peloponnisos on top of a mountain, far away from sea/rivers). Additionally, Troy’s architecture is phony: statues and people’s clothes is a mix up from Messopotamia, later Greece and Egypt and have nothing to do with the real Troy. Even worse, Odysseus’ armor is the exact same as the one Romans had, 1200 years after his time! NOTHING in this movie is authentic-looking. This movie FAILS miserably to capture the world of 1200 BC. People are more familiar with how things looked in 500 BC in Greece or in 100 AD in Rome, and they don’t bother researching the Mycynae civilization and its surroundings (which had nothing to do with the later Greece of the Socrates time that most people are familiar with).

Something that not many non-greeks know is that the “Greeks” of 1200 BC (and the trojan war) are NOT the same “race” as the ones lived in 500 BC (which was the high-point of the greek civilization that most people are familiar about). A race called Ahaioi came to Greece from the north about 1000 BC, killed off the current greek residents (called Dorieis in reality) and conquered the land and had their own civilization developed. That’s why the world of 1200 BC DOES NOT LOOK the same as the one the movie conveniently tries to show as “generally greek” (‘gourouni sto saki’ as we say in Greece).

To recap: It’s fine to change the storyline over the original, because making a successful movie that works with modern audiences is what counts ultimately (people payed millions to create this movie, they should see some revenue back). But changing stuff that *wouldn’t hurt* to leave unchanged, is where that art director and producer needs pissing on.

In this fight, both the Greeks and the producers are wrong: Greeks for getting pissed off for the wrong reasons (with their known chauvinistic approach over things) and the producers for not doing proper historical research on the subject to try to authentically recreate the world of 1200 BC.

Comments are closed as this blog post is now archived.

Lines, paragraphs break automatically. HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

The URI to TrackBack this blog entry is this. And here is the RSS 2.0 for comments on this post.