The Panasonic FZ38 video digicam

Panasonic announced yesterday the FZ38, an 18x super-zoom camera (called FZ35 in US). Not really the brightest idea for a digicam purchase. However, this camera has other features that can prove very useful to people who need 24p with manual controls for cheap ($400).

See, this camera is the first consumer non-DSLR digicam that offers manual controls in video mode! It has both shutter speed and aperture controls! At this point, I can only assume that when in this manual video mode, the exposure will stop jumping left and right as it does currently with other Panasonic digicams.

Then, there’s the frame rate thing. According to DPReview, the camera can do 25p and 30p (depending which model used, European or US), at 17 mbps AVCHD-Lite. However, it saves the videos in a really bad way, and makes editors *think* that it has recorded in 50p and 60p, while in fact it just has duplicated the frames. On Sony Vegas you have to specifically tell it to use either 25 fps or 30 fps (depending if you used the European or the US model) in order to avoid the duplicated frames. Sample 25p/50p .mts file here (bottom of the page).

So in a scenario where you shot in 25p (with 1/50th shutter speed), you edit as such, and at the end you re-time the video to become 24p (if desired). This will produce a very filmic motion look, as close as it gets with a digicam. Yes, there are other cheap digicams that do 24p right out of the box, but they don’t offer manual shutter speed control, which is an important ingredient in the quest to get the filmic motion look.

Additionally, color/saturation/contrast/brightness controls are offered in video mode, as well as manual white balance. In conclusion:

Pros:
– Shutter speed manual control
– Aperture manual control
– 25p can easily be converted to 24p
– Color adjustments
– Manual white balance
– Manual focusing in addition to auto focusing
– By using a CCD sensor won’t produce wobbly videos

Cons:
– Small sensor (1/2.33″)
– Its doubling of frame rate is stupid and unnecessary
– Not a fast lens (meaning, less background blur than the HV20)
– To get the 25p recording you need to buy the European (FZ38) version.
– We are still not sure if exposure will continue jumping even when in manual control mode (there was no word about ISO/gain control you see)
– Its 17 mbps bitrate is much lower than Canon’s 24 mbps digicams in 720p

4 Comments »

blover wrote on July 29th, 2009 at 7:42 PM PST:

anybody who would buy a digicam mainly for video is a moron… end of story, even if some of the image competes with camcorders it’s still idiotic.


This is the admin speaking...
Eugenia wrote on July 29th, 2009 at 8:14 PM PST:

You are wrong. There are a lot of people who just want a single device that does most of what they need. For many people, convenience is more important than function.

You know why your comment is so funny? Because this is EXACTLY what people were saying in 2004 about phones: “why the heck would I need applications on my cellphone? I have a PDA for that!”

Look where the industry is now.


Vassilis Perantzakis wrote on August 1st, 2009 at 8:21 AM PST:

Hi Eugenia, I am thinking of buying a low cost super zoom camera mainly for taking pictures during the day. I have been thinking of buying the Pentax X70. What do you think of this camera? (http://www.pentaximaging.com/digital-camera/X70/)


This is the admin speaking...
Eugenia wrote on August 1st, 2009 at 9:52 AM PST:

If you are interested in video too, get the Canon SX200 IS instead.


Comments are closed as this blog post is now archived.

Lines, paragraphs break automatically. HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

The URI to TrackBack this blog entry is this. And here is the RSS 2.0 for comments on this post.