Groklaw == filthy ?

SCO’s lawyers apparently believe that “Pamela Jones” does not exist and that Groklaw is penned by a team of IBM lawyers.”

While SCO is not to be taken seriously, there is a good chance that what they claim is true. And if it’s true, I feel sorry for the thousands of Linux fans who were tricked by the supposedly innocent IBM. Thankfully, at OSNews very rarely we linked to Groklaw’s (ultra-biased) articles. But other sites, like Newsforge and Slashdot, were linking to Groklaw continuously.


memson wrote on February 14th, 2007 at 11:21 AM PST:

Vey interesting. I was only reading some biased BS by her in a UK Linux magazine last night. Notably, there was no real picture of her – only a drawing. Odd I thought. All other contributers has a photograph…

mikesum32 wrote on February 14th, 2007 at 11:50 AM PST:

It should be pointed out that SCO, as a rule, hurls unfounded rumors and frivolous lawsuits, like owning linux.

Phil wrote on February 17th, 2007 at 1:45 AM PST:

Groklaw has had to deal with the reality of a firm that tried to destroy Linux by any means possible. It is not that Groklaw is “ultra-biased” it is that it is a black and white case of right and wrong.

Comments are closed as this blog post is now archived.

Lines, paragraphs break automatically. HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

The URI to TrackBack this blog entry is this. And here is the RSS 2.0 for comments on this post.